How immersive digital experiences should deal with calls to action

July 12, 2010 · Posted in Advertising, Technology · Comment 

So Steve Jobs has it all figured out how we’re going to consume ads in an immersive experience like an iPad app. The solution seems to be to make another app that has content so great that you’ll want to experience it. That may make sense for highly creative products like films or books or high ticket items like cars or high-end electronics, but that doesn’t really help consumer product and food companies, small businesses, etc. Not only would creating such experiences be costly and time intensive, but making commercials that require even more time to consume is likely to get old with consumers.

The other options are to do what we essentially have now — video ads in anything streaming (game, Hulu app, whatever) and basically print ads in anything to be read (like a magazine app). The problem there is that all you can capture is mindshare, which is no improvement over what print and television already offered — but with, usually, a much smaller audience.

It seems to me that the most nonobtrusive but still effective way to go about this is to provide a discrete button during a video ad or on a static ad that consumers can click that triggers an action that doesn’t jerk them out of their experience. How could this be done?

One thing Hulu does is pop up a fairly non-intrusive dialog  during its commercials that asks “Is this ad relevant to you?” and provides a “yes” and “no” button. It’s non-intrusive because it shows up in the frame rather across the “screen” itself. I suggest a modification of this that provides a simple “more” text button or perhaps an icon (that hopefully gains traction and becomes universal) that is displayed discreetly in the frame around the video or static/Flash animation ad. When clicked (or more likely touched since this is really intended to work with tablet apps), an action is triggered that takes place in the background. This could be everything from send you a link in an e-mail or text message to bookmark the site to Delicious to add an item to Google reader. Ideally, the platform for this call to action would be able to thread itself through most of the apps and would customizable by the user. The user him or herself could choose what the action is, thus setting the zone where he or she is willing to receive more information or coupons or a request to sign up for a mailing list of like a page on a social media site.

I also suggest that the follow up to the call of action, the thing that is triggered by touching the “more” button be heavy on the informational side of things. Advertisers can deliver the emotion in the ad. If consumers are interested, then the next step is to provide them with something that allows them to indicate that interest without jerking them out of the immersive experience, the app that they are currently in. Add in (depending on the app and advertiser) location awareness and a build up of consumer preference information, and I think you have an effective advertising platform that consumers will be more willing to engage with.

Tags: <, , , , >

Features I want from Hulu, Netflix, Gmail and other web services

September 4, 2009 · Posted in Social Media, Technology · 3 Comments 

I have no major complaints about most of the web services I use*. Of course, that’s a bit tautological because if I hated them, I wouldn’t use them. But anyway, I do have some suggestions for minor improvements to the following web services:

Hulu: I would like a smarter queue that tracks what I have already seen. It’s great that you can subscribe to shows and when new episodes get loaded on to Hulu, they pop in your queue. But because episodes sometimes get taken down (after I have seen them) and then put back up (for example, to drum up excitement for the start of a new season), the queue oftens clogged with episodes of a show that I have already viewed on Hulu. I want an option to only show ones I haven’t viewed already — and for re-uploads to recognize that I saw them on the first go round.

Netflix: I would like a queue that’s just like the current queue but is for tracking purposes only, and I want to be able to subscribe to actors, directors, writers, studios, awards lists, certain critics picks, sub-genres and sub-sub-genres and when something new is acquired by Netflix that features the keywords and  individuals I’ve subscribed to, I want those titles to appear at the top of that tracking queue.**

Gmail: I love Gmail. I’m one of those who immediately took to thread conversations and tags instead of folders.  There is one feature I’d like though: the ability to tag an e-mail before (or as you go to) send it.

Google Docs: Yes, you can export Google Docs in a variety of formats, but there are occassions where I like to simply publish a Doc. For those instances I’d like to be able to have the option of auto-pagination (and be able to specify how many paragraphs or words for each page).

Twitter: I know this is supposed to be on the way, but, imo, the ability to RT from the web interface can’t happen soon enough. Yes, I use Tweetdeck and Hootsuite fairly often, but sometimes the web interface it just easiest to use, and I’d like to be able to easily retweet from it.

YouTube: I want 20 minute video uploads. Some better metrics tools (and even integration with Google Analytics) would be nice too.

Flock: I want it to open faster.

Flickr: I want the ability to batch organize sets and collections without going in to Flickr’s Ajax (sometimes browser resource heavy) Organizer e.g. just using titles of everything without thumbnails and the drag and drop feature — a light version, I guess, of the Flickr Organizer.

GoodReads: I want the ability to easily order titles on  shelves (both drag and drop and enter number) and the ability to select multiple shelves and only show the titles that match all the selected shelves.

*Facebook is the Big Exception, but I’m not going to go in to all that in what is intended to be a light, quick post.

**I also want Linux supported Netflix On Demand, but that’s not a feature  improvement, per se.

Tags: <, , , , , , , >